Archive for the 'Future' Category

The $1000 Seastead Design Contest

Or open source design for inde­pen­dent microna­tions.

The idea is this: The Seast­eading Insti­tute, a non-profit orga­ni­za­tion con­ceived about a year ago by Patri Fried­man and Wayne Gram­lich, is propos­ing a frame­work that would make it pos­si­ble to per­ma­nently set­tle on the ocean. Their vision, inspired by the cul­ture of web 2.0, is to crowd-source the devel­op­ment of government.

seastead1seast­eading

What they have done is designed a bare plat­form, called a seast­ead, that is about the size of a city block. They are encour­ag­ing every­one to share their idea for a per­ma­nent civ­i­liza­tion on the ocean through The $1000 Seast­ead Design Con­test (sub­mis­sions due May 1st, 2009). Con­tes­tants are to expound upon the plat­form in any way they see fit – “It may be a hos­pi­tal, a casino, a res­i­den­tial com­mu­nity, a cricket sta­dium, or some­thing entirely dif­fer­ent.” The idea is to share and to col­lec­tively reach this goal. Designs for the seast­eads will be released under a Cre­ative Com­mons license.

seastead2Wendy Sitler-Roddier

[They are] hop­ing to cre­ate a plat­form in the sense that Linux is a plat­form: a base upon which peo­ple can build their own inno­v­a­tive forms of gov­er­nance. The ulti­mate goal is to cre­ate stan­dards and blue­prints that can be eas­ily adapted, allow­ing small com­mu­ni­ties to rapidly incu­bate and test new mod­els of self-rule with the same ease that a pro­gram­mer in his garage can whip up a Face­book app.
WIRED and BLDGBLOG

As com­pared to other projects of this nature, The Seast­eading Insti­tute is try­ing to build a mod­u­lar frame­work which allows for many dif­fer­ent ideals. Because they don’t focus on one spe­cific model that could fail, the project is much more sus­tain­able. Although I do not par­tic­u­larly sub­scribe to Lib­er­tar­i­an­ism, I have inter­est in projects like this for their for­ward think­ing ideas. The Seast­eading Insti­tute is not respond­ing as much to cli­mate change, but to soci­etal change. Maybe there is some­thing we can learn from their model.

Waterpod Project – A Floating World

waterpod_newstuff_v0003
Water­pod Project (ren­der­ings by James Halver­son of Lux Visual Effects)

A recur­ring theme for the future seems to be alter­na­tive hous­ing. The Water­pod Project intends to be a model for the future of archi­tec­ture and liv­ing. It is con­cerned with the same basic prob­lems as other projects, cli­mate change and increas­ing world pop­u­la­tion, but takes a dif­fer­ent approach. Where Polar Cities and Lily­pad are pri­mar­ily con­cerned with phys­i­cal sur­vival, Water­pod is inter­ested in cre­ativ­ity and expression.

The Water­pod is inspir­ing because it has moved past the hypo­thet­i­cal, it is cur­rently being con­structed in New York. Being a model for future build­ing, sus­tain­abil­ity is the key. The Water­pod is being built on a retired indus­trial barge using sal­vaged mate­ri­als. It fea­tures three domes to be used for artis­tic space, sleep­ing quar­ters, and agriculture.

It is cur­rently sched­uled to launch in New York in May, 2009, from the New­town Creek between Brook­lyn and Queens, nav­i­gate down the East River, explore the waters of New York Har­bor, and stop­ping at each of the five bor­oughs it will dock at sev­eral Man­hat­tan piers on the Hud­son River, then beyond.
Water­pod Structure

rowhouse_v0002_lo
Water­pod artist res­i­dency building

To begin with there will be five res­i­dents who will live and work and be com­pletely sus­tained on the barge. They plan to travel around to teach, give tours, and have exhi­bi­tions. They hope to be a model and inspi­ra­tion for the future, to pre­pare and to encour­age innovation.

This forces me to focus on cer­tain things that I have been putting off for too long, and forces me to live like we will prob­a­bly all need to live sooner or later.
Mary Mat­tingly

More positive

I just found out Sunday
I was lis­ten­ing to an inter­view with Sally Car­son (Fix­pert) on Bike Talk on KPFK today and she was say­ing cool stuff about the way you should act as a cyclist. About not being all aggro and flip­ping the bird, but just truck­ing along in all weather hav­ing a good time. When you send out pos­i­tive vibes to drivers, you inspire them to bike because it looks so fun (and then you won’t inspire dri­vers to hate cyclists more). 

I needed to hear that. I some­times get really frus­trated with cars and suvs cut­ting me off or almost hit­ting me and I yell and flip the bird. It can really get to me, about how cars have more rights, and can just run you off the road, and that the police or who­ever would take their side. And how cars con­tribute to smog and exhaust just chok­ing me and short­en­ing my life. Bitches. 

But like Laura tells me, it is not worth get­ting so mad and worked up over. Also, like Sally said, you can inspire them to ride bikes, which is like bet­ter for the whole world. And they were talk­ing about on the show that any­one on any kind of bike (road, moun­tain, beach cruiser, fixed gear, what­ever) is GREAT because it is SO MUCH BETTER than them dri­ving around in SUVs. There is no rea­son to be an elit­ist about it. The main goals of the cycling com­mu­nity should always to have more peo­ple riding. 

I have always been inspired by peo­ple like that, being so cool and nice to every­one. I feel like there are elit­ist and accept­ing cool peo­ple in any com­mu­nity. I would like to be more like that, not all aggro and elit­ist all the time, but be really cool, pos­i­tive, and accept­ing. We all have a right to love life and not to be shamed for trying.

I am prepared for amazing things to happen


Cyclist Takes Bed Along in Home­made Trailer (Oct, 1940)

I am siked! Stoked! Wack! I don’t know. But I’m pretty pumped. We are at this cross­roads in our life, our econ­omy, etc etc and all that yucky stuff, where we can really do any­thing we want. WHAT HAVE WE GOT TO LOSE? Very lit­tle really.

This pic­ture is maybe the third thing to really get me pumped this year so far. First was read­ing Swim­ming to Antarc­tica by Lynne Cox. I mean, she has to be the coolest most inspir­ing per­son. Like really UP THERE with Gandhi or Dr. King or Obama, you know? She has been swim­ming her whole life. She swam the Bering Strait! No wet­suit, no spe­cial warm­ing noth­ing, she just swam it in her bathing suit. Not only that, she swam from the USA to the Soviet Union DURING THE COLD WAR. How pow­er­ful and inspir­ing is that? Not only was she swim­ming in like 40° water, but she was swim­ming for diplo­macy. And swim­ming the Bering Strait wasn’t her only or biggest accom­plish­ment, she has set all kinds of world records and swam in all kinds of places where no one ever has. In short, read her book! Buy it or get it at the library or bor­row mine. It is very important.

So that was the first thing. The sec­ond thing isn’t as spe­cific. It is a more gen­eral con­cept, or a move­ment really. L has been get­ting pretty deep into the idea of per­ma­cul­ture (to over gen­er­al­ize and state the obvi­ous). She has been an incred­i­ble wealth of knowl­edge and keeps shar­ing these mind-blowing things that peo­ple are doing. Like “…there is this farm run by two ladies near santa cruz and they deliver the CSA on bike.” Whoa! Right? And that is only the tip of the ice­berg. There is a quote that maybe typ­i­fies the sec­ond thing.

…cook­ing, sewing, wash­ing, clean­ing, read­ing, gar­den­ing, fix­ing, writ­ing, draw­ing, craft­ing. woman’s work? per­haps. but i think its bet­ter than lin­ing the pock­ets of some­one else, work­ing for basi­cally noth­ing (for what end or pur­pose), prob­a­bly harm­ing the earth more (we have 30 less envi­ron­ment impact by me not work­ing). this work i do at home ben­e­fits us, not some unknown corp exec and doesnt pol­lute the earth.

We have made the choice to live off of one salary (and my hus­band works only four days a week) and that means that we will always be poor. one car, less “stuff”, noth­ing new for years, but much more hap­pier. that means we get to see and be part of her mile­stones, hear each new word uttered and each new task mas­tered.
per­ma­cul­ture of family

It is about mak­ing a choice, decid­ing what you want to live for or to work towards. This may be a painfully obvi­ous and juve­nile con­cept, but I feel like I’m real­iz­ing its mean­ing fully for the first time.

The third thing is, as I have stated, this image from the Octo­ber 1940 issue of Pop­u­lar Sci­ence. Chet Jr. trav­eled 1,200 miles in 14 days fund­ing his trip by sell­ing post cards? WHAT? Are you kid­ding? That is very awe­some. AND he made that awe­some trailer to sleep in? Can I do that please? But seri­ously, what is stop­ping us from liv­ing out our dreams and doing very cool things like Chet Jr.?

So for 2009, a year of “change”, I am resolved to really think through what I want to accom­plish in my life and start doing it.

Vertical Farming

2008_10_08-VerticalFarming.jpg
The Ver­ti­cal Farm Project, led by Dr. Dick­son Despom­mier of Colum­bia Uni­ver­sity, aims to deal with the prob­lem of feed­ing the grow­ing world pop­u­la­tion. The idea is to build ver­ti­cal indoor farm­ing struc­tures within urban centers.

The Ver­ti­cal Farm must be effi­cient (cheap to con­struct and safe to oper­ate). Ver­ti­cal farms, many sto­ries high, will be sit­u­ated in the heart of the world’s urban cen­ters. If suc­cess­fully imple­mented, they offer the promise of urban renewal, sus­tain­able pro­duc­tion of a safe and var­ied food sup­ply (year-round crop pro­duc­tion), and the even­tual repair of ecosys­tems that have been sac­ri­ficed for hor­i­zon­tal farming.

pers_generale.jpg

This sec­ond ren­der­ing looks like an eco-friendly data center.

I am deeply inter­ested in projects that make an effort to take waste out, the least power needed for the most ben­e­fi­cial out­come, that way things work more effi­ciently. This con­cept of sim­plic­ity in design can apply to many dif­fer­ent things, Gen­too Linux (opti­mized and cus­tomized fla­vor of linux), fixed gear bicy­cles (less parts, less weight), or farm­ing. We must learn to farm effi­ciently and locally because “by the year 2050, nearly 80% of the earth’s pop­u­la­tion will reside in urban centers.”

swcdiagramblack.jpg
Self water­ing con­tain­ers
remind me con­cep­tu­ally of The Ver­ti­cal Farm. The self water­ing con­tainer takes out the effort of that goes into the water­ing and main­taing of a gar­den, and work well for urban or apart­ment liv­ing because they are com­pact and self-contained.

We must have a solu­tion for the future and the Ver­ti­cal Farm Project has many good ideas. And as they point out, “we can­not go to the moon, Mars, or beyond with­out first learn­ing to farm indoors on earth.”

Monday is my 24th birthday

Last night Laura and I were talk­ing about how we both feel weird about cel­e­brat­ing our birth­days. This does not seem to be a prob­lem for every­one. The feel­ing hap­pens every year around my birth­day. It isn’t that I don’t want to cel­e­brate. I’m not really sure how to cel­e­brate. Birth­days, like all hol­i­days, have so many expec­ta­tions. Expec­ta­tions makes cel­e­bra­tions feel totally weird.

So what should hap­pen on birth­day? I cel­e­brated my 22nd and 23rd birth­days at the Brown House. (I don’t imag­ine I will cel­e­brate my 24th there.) I tried to get tick­ets for Wait Wait Don’t Tell Me, but that didn’t work out. My idea for this year was to use my birth­day as an excuse to do the things we never do. So I want to make an apple pie, have french fries, drink a soy choco­late milk­shake, have a really hoppy beer, maybe hang out at a park? Who’s with me?

The future of Existential Media

I’ve been lik­ing Mov­able Type less and less lately. A lot of the prob­lems stem from it being writ­ten in perl and per­for­mance issues related to that (I assume). I’ve been look­ing at dif­fer­ent ways to make Exis­ten­tial Media work bet­ter (faster) and be more sta­ble. I’ve done some opti­miz­ing lately of Mov­able Type and my tem­plates (as far as I can with my know-how), but it hasn’t helped ter­ri­bly. I’ve looked at dif­fer­ent hosts and host­ing plans, but there is always cost to con­sider, as well as effort it takes to move to a new host. So in the short term it looks like we are stick­ing with Mov­able Type and Dreamhost.

I’ve started to look at this prob­lem and set long term goals. Although I have learned a lot about Mov­able Type and although it would be a pain to learn a new plat­form, I’ve been “shop­ping” around. I’ve looked at Textpat­tern, which though I like a lot, wouldn’t be good at han­dling some­thing like Exis­ten­tial Media. It works bet­ter to power one site / one blog. Man­ag­ing users and per­mis­sions and blogs seems like it would not be fun. There is also Expres­sio­nEngine, but there is the prob­lem of cost, so that’s a no go. I’m get­ting to the point now. I’ve been heav­ily con­sid­er­ing using Dru­pal. Dru­pal is what is used to power the Onion’s web­site. I installed it and have been tin­kered around with it for a last cou­ple days. So far so good I guess. There is a huge learn­ing curve. It’s a whole new deal. I don’t really know how to come at it just yet. And they focus on being easy on the resources, which is also a good thing. I’ve also looked at Word­press MU, which is what they use to power wordpress.com. It might be exchang­ing one prob­lem for another, but Word­press is very fast and pretty. I’ve more or less decided to go with Word­press (that is, unless Mov­able Type is rewrit­ten in PHP or some­thing). Also, the most recent ver­sion of Word­press was designed by Happy Cog, which is pretty cool.

At first I thought heav­ily about going with Dru­pal, but I decided against it. Although it would work, Dru­pal doesn’t have blog­ging first in mind, it is a full fea­tured CMS. I also was hav­ing trou­ble get­ting to know it. Before I decided against it though, I started writ­ing this post. So I’ve mod­i­fied it. Here is my orig­i­nal game plan for Drupal:

I have to fig­ure out how this all works. I need to “port” my themes over to Dru­pal. I need to move all the data too. There is a Typepad/Movable Type con­ver­tor, but I’m not sure exactly how it will work. There is a list of things I can’t fig­ure out just yet and I thought it would be good to present here.

  • Giv­ing a user a blog: I’m a lit­tle con­fused about this. I want it to be like it is now. I give Laura a blog named lady­parts and it has a cer­tain design. And the con­tent does not get inter­mixed with the rest of the site. I’m not really clear how to man­age “blogs” yet. A project that I’ve been look­ing at is Dru­pal MU. This solves the prob­lem of hav­ing a dif­fer­ent theme for each blog. Some­things I’m con­fused about though. Like does the blog name always have to be the same as the user’s? (Like “Laura’s Blog” … existentialmedia.org/laura)
  • Hav­ing many users to one blog: I’m not really clear on how this would work. Think­ing about WIWT, how can I have a blog named “What I Wore Today” and have the url (/today) and have dif­fer­ent users post to it? Is this possible?
  • I need to fig­ure out how to have a list of the most recent posts on the home­page with the blog col­ors, but that might come once I fig­ure out the other things.

But since we prob­a­bly won’t be using Dru­pal, there is no need to worry any­more about that. Here is why I like Wordpress.

  • It is easy to man­age, and although it is very dif­fer­ent than Mov­able Type, I felt at home almost right away. It has the same idea of blogs and users, and try­ing out the import fea­ture it imported all the posts and com­ments on my blog flawlessly.
  • I did need to install one plu­gin right away to embed youtube, vimeo, etc which isn’t the most ideal. But was painless.
  • Word­press is very fast because it is writ­ten in PHP. I like this part a lot. No more rebuild­ing! I plan on installing one of the caching plu­g­ins too so we shouldn’t have any problems.
  • The only rea­son we aren’t there yet is that I have to fig­ure out the tem­plates. It looks to be not that hard, but will take some time. I want to make the tem­plates more eas­ily cus­tomiz­able and this seems pos­si­ble to do with Word­press themes.

Do you have any ques­tions? Fears? Knowl­edge to impart on this sub­ject? I would really like to be in com­mu­ni­ca­tion with every­body as much as pos­si­ble on this.

A deeper connection

Polar Cities

1959_chicago_tribune.jpgIf there was some­thing that you really believed and knew that if acted upon it could save human­ity, what would it look like to ded­i­cate your life to this cause? What if you were wrong? What if peo­ple crit­i­cized you for it? Would it still mat­ter? You would never know whether you were right until you knew. Over the past week I’ve been think­ing a lot about cli­mate change. What sparked this cur­rent thread was a news story I read about Dan Bloom and his plan for the cli­mate cri­sis. He has ded­i­cated him­self to this project in a vul­ner­a­ble and unin­hib­ited way. Dan Bloom’s idea is to pre­pare for the loom­ing cli­mate dis­as­ter by build­ing Polar Cities. I totally geeked out on the idea of Polar Cities and I was able to inter­view Dan Bloom about him­self and his plans.

Tell me a lit­tle about your­self. How did you become inter­ested in cli­mate change and polar cities?

dan_bloom.jpg

I was inter­ested in cli­mate change and global warm­ing before 2007, in other words from 1971 to 2006, just as a nor­mal news­pa­per reader, aware of the sit­u­a­tion, but not deeply aware, nor very con­cerned, just nor­mal low-frequency aware­ness from news­pa­per and mag­a­zine arti­cles I had read from col­lege grad­u­a­tion in 1971 to life in the real world of the early 21st Cen­tury. THEN one day, I read two arti­cles in the news­pa­per here in Tai­wan: one was about the upcom­ing IPCC report on cli­mate change, released in Feb­ru­ary 2007, and then two was an inter­view with James Love­lock the UK sci­en­tist who said that in his view in the future, there might be only “breed­ing pairs in the Arc­tic” to con­tinue the human species after global warm­ing “events” cause mass migra­tion north and mass die offs of humans, from a pop­u­la­tion of 10 bil­lion to maybe just 200,000 left. When I read this, I had a eureka moment, I woke up at the moment. At first I was depressed. I wrote a long essay on my blog about how things are really screwed. But after re-reading what I wrote, which was basi­cally depress­ing and sad writ­ing, I woke up again and said to myself: Hey, you can’t go around mop­ing about and feel­ing sad for the world, try to do some­thing pos­i­tive, some­thing to give you and oth­ers hope. So I visu­al­ized humans liv­ing in polar cities in the north­ern areas in the year 2500 or so, and that is how I began this quixotic adven­ture. Via the blo­gos­phere. And 12 months later I found an artist, in Tai­wan, where I live, Deng Cheng-hong, who agreed to make some illus­tra­tions for me, on com­mis­sion. I paid him for his work and two months later he gave me these amaz­ing illus­tra­tions. He is genius. In fact, his visual images have made this project leap off the page and into people’s imag­i­na­tions, so all credit goes to him. James Love­lock has seen these images and said to me via email: “It may very well hap­pen and soon.”

Are polar cities your response to the cli­mate crisis?

Yes, this project is my per­sonal response to the cli­mate cri­sis, my small con­tri­bu­tion to the ongo­ing global dis­cus­sion. It’s my way of tak­ing part in what I think is a pos­i­tive way in the debate.

Are the aims of polar cities to accom­mo­date a lucky few or all of humanity?

City Illustration by Deng Cheng-hong

The aim of the polar cities project is to accom­mo­date all of sur­viv­ing human­ity, in an open demo­c­ra­tic human­i­tar­ian way. These cities are not just for the lucky few or the rich or the pow­er­ful. My phi­los­o­phy and aim is to start plan­ning for these adap­ta­tion cities now, in 2008, so that by the time we need them, humankind has fig­ured out how to make them open and demo­c­ra­tic. But if things get really bad in the future, out of a world pop­u­la­tion of maybe 15 bil­lion peo­ple in 2500, there might be only 200,000 sur­vivors. In that case, these peo­ple will be the lucky few. Or unlucky few, some might say. But they will be the breed­ing pairs who keep the human species alive for many gen­er­a­tions inside these polar cities and then come out and repop­u­late the Earth again when the time is right. The polar city era might last 100 years or 1000 years or even 10,000 years. So these polar cities are lifeboats for humankind, for the human species, not just for the lucky few. I have no chil­dren, so there is no per­sonal intent here for me. I am doing this because I have com­pas­sion for the future. A deep com­pas­sion for the future, and this is now my life’s work. Unpaid. On my own time. On my own dime. My con­tri­bu­tion, in a small minor way, to the ongo­ing debate, pro and con, about cli­mate change.

In a recent Guardian arti­cle, James Love­lock is quoted as say­ing “Enjoy life while you can” in regards to the cli­mate cri­sis. Do you see ideas like recy­cling and car­bon off­set­ting as useless?

Love­lock is my men­tor in all this, and that recent Guardian inter­view was very insight­ful, I thought. I agree with him on many of the things he said. How­ever, he is 88 and I am 58, so being 30 years younger I still have more hope and opti­mism that we can solve this cli­mate cri­sis prob­lem with real solu­tions. So yes, recy­cling and car­bon off­set­ting are impor­tant ideas and I agree we should imple­ment them as best we can, and do all we can NOW to try to mit­i­gate global warm­ing in the here and now. I have not given up hope. I still think we can solve this Long Emer­gency, but there will have to be some sacrifices.

Is tech­nol­ogy part of the problem?

It is a part of the prob­lem and a pos­si­ble solu­tion to the prob­lem, too. My fin­gers are crossed. I hope some­one can come up with a tech­no­log­i­cal fix for the cli­mate cri­sis. That is where my hope lies. Yes, but in the case that worst come to worst, I feel that polar cities can be our lifeboats to get us through a long period of north­ern life, maybe for 30 gen­er­a­tions of humans.

The polar cities have been likened to fall­out shel­ters, how would you respond to this?

I never thought of polar cities as fall­out shel­ters. But we could call them global warm­ing shel­ters. Lifeboats. I see them more as lifeboats. The cold war men­tal­ity of fall­out shel­ters is not really appro­pri­ate for polar cities. But head­line writ­ers have wild imag­i­na­tions and I appre­ci­ate all head­line writ­ers attempts to grap­ple with these issues.

Do we need a sense of impend­ing dis­as­ter to give our­selves some­thing to work towards?

You are right. Yes, we need a real deep sense of impend­ing dis­as­ter to wake us up. Love­lock and Hansen and oth­ers are impor­tant in issu­ing wake up calls to human­ity. I am just a sol­dier in the trenches launch­ing my polar cities idea as a non-threatening thought exper­i­ment to wake peo­ple up in another way, visu­ally. I remain an eter­nal opti­mist and I wake up every day full of energy to fight this cli­mate cri­sis. This IS the fight of human­ity, all human­ity. We need all the ideas we can get.

What’s the name say on the gravestone? Lantry. William Lantry.

In response to the many 2007-list-posts I’ve read, I wanted to do my own. This is going to be a com­pletely self-indulgent list of accom­plish­ments of sorts. It was an event­ful year to be sure. So, here it goes.

In 2007, I…
Erased my pre-2007 exis­tence on the inter­net
Made a new Flickr
Joined Vimeo
Got Travis
Got into good beer
Remade Exis­ten­tial Media
Lost Travis
Found Travis / Gave Travis to my par­ents
Had the best sum­mer of my life*
Went on a long bike ride car­ry­ing beer
Made new friends
Went to Port­land
Got Engaged
Lost Ulti­mate Blog­ger 3
Made the Prescott Fam­ily
Got Mar­got
Grad­u­ated col­lege
Went to Port­land again

That’s my basic out­line of the past year. I feel pretty good about it.